SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE | 1-MINUTE READ
A 2026 editorial published in the Revista Brasileira de Saúde Ocupacional examines the possibilities and limitations of artificial intelligence (AI) in scientific writing, with particular emphasis on research integrity.
The authors explain how AI tools can support writing, translation, literature searches and reference management. However, they also warn about fabricated information, nonexistent references and confidentiality risks.
What are the main points?
3 key points
- A support tool: AI can help improve manuscripts, translate content, identify scientific literature and organize references.
- Risk of errors: AI systems may generate incorrect claims, fabricated citations or convincing statements unsupported by evidence.
- Author responsibility: AI use should be disclosed according to editorial requirements, remain subject to human oversight and never replace scientific judgment.
How is this useful in professional practice?
For dental professionals involved in research, manuscript preparation or scientific presentations, AI can facilitate information organization, text editing and translation.
Its use requires checking original references, verifying data and protecting confidential information, particularly when handling unpublished research or patient information.
Important: this is an editorial on good practices, not an experimental study measuring the accuracy or effectiveness of a specific AI tool. The authors emphasize that AI should assist researchers rather than replace critical thinking.
Original article:
Inteligência artificial na elaboração de artigos científicos: usos, limites e boas práticas.
Authors: Anarosa Alves Franco Brandão, Leila Posenato Garcia and Luisa Veras de Sandes-Guimarães.